ConcrItConcrIT
Why ConcrIT

More than a method,
a tangible advantage

The stress field method is justified not only by its theoretical rigour — it delivers tangible economic, environmental and structural gains for every project.

10–30%
reduction in reinforcement
8%
of global CO₂ comes from concrete
1.03
mean ratio over 315 tests
01
Economic optimization

Lower construction costs

By precisely modelling the stress flow, ConcrIT avoids the excess thicknesses and superfluous reinforcement imposed by prescriptive approaches. Less steel means direct savings on material, rebar labour and construction schedule.

10–30%
typical reduction in reinforcement compared with a prescriptive approach
Ø over-design
no global “precautionary” coefficients — every result is justified by an admissible stress state
Direct ROI
the license cost is amply covered from the very first medium-sized project

Invest in thinking rather than in material. The accuracy of the model replaces empirical margins. The engineer regains control of the force flow — and the design office offers its client an economical and justified design. Less material also means less concrete and steel put in place — and therefore a reduced environmental cost (see below).

02
Free modelling

Verification of complex structures

ConcrIT lets you model any geometry — deep beams, nodes, corbels, discontinuity regions, non-prismatic sections — with the same ease as a standard member, and obtain clear, accurate results. Where classical code-based methods impose simplified models valid only for standard cases, ConcrIT relies on generalized stress fields to handle the real geometry of the structure directly.

D-REGIONS

Nodes, corbels, openings, changes of section — regions where the Bernoulli (plane sections) assumption does not apply.

SHEAR

Shear verification in slabs, deep beams and walls — including in regions where it combines with bending, exactly where simplified code formulas are least reliable.

FORCE INTERACTION

A member subjected simultaneously to several actions (axial force, bending, shear, torsion) is checked within a single consistent model — instead of adding up separate checks via approximate interaction formulas.

03
Before / after state

Before/after state for modifications to existing structures

This same modelling freedom makes it easy to compare a structure’s initial state with its projected state after modification. ConcrIT models the existing (as-built) geometry and reinforcement, then the modified configuration, to directly visualize the stress redistribution and design strictly the strengthening needed — without demolishing or over-designing as a precaution.

OPENINGS & CORE DRILLING

A frequent case in technical renovation: cutting an opening (door) in a shear wall, or core drilling a wall or transfer beam to route ducts. ConcrIT compares the before/after state to check the stress redistribution around the opening and design the necessary local strengthening.

ASSESSMENT & STRENGTHENING

Evaluation of the residual capacity from existing drawings and in-situ measurements, then design of the added reinforcement, jacketing or shotcrete required to reach the target state.

CHANGE OF USE

Validation of an increased imposed load (e.g. storage → offices → housing) with rigorous justification, instead of systematically replacing the members.

The best structure is often the one you don’t need to rebuild. By proving that the existing structure can absorb the new loads or accommodate an opening, ConcrIT avoids heavy works — and the concrete and steel that would have been needed to carry them out.

04
Sustainability & carbon footprint

Reducing the carbon footprint of structures

Concrete is the most consumed construction material in the world — and among the most energy-intensive. Its production accounts for about 8% of global CO₂ emissions. At the same time, sand — an essential aggregate — is becoming a resource under pressure worldwide. Optimizing a structure directly reduces its material mass and therefore its impact.

Concrete — resource under pressure

Cement clinker production is highly carbon-intensive (≈ 0.8 kg CO₂/kg). Quality sand for concrete is extracted faster than it renews. Reducing concrete volumes is an environmental and economic necessity in the medium term.

Steel — manufacturing impact

Each tonne of reinforcing steel represents ≈ 1.8 t CO₂. Reducing reinforcement ratios by 15% on a standard building typically corresponds to dozens of tonnes of avoided emissions.

↓CO₂

ConcrIT turns structural rigour into an environmental lever. Less concrete, less steel, with no compromise on safety — thanks to modelling that truly exploits the structure’s capacity instead of ignoring it.

Ready to design better, with less?

Try ConcrIT free for 14 days, or explore the scientific foundations of the method.